double liar paradox

In a village, the barber shaves everyone who does not shave himself/herself, but no one else. Although chronologically he precedes all modern treatments of the problem of the liar paradox, it has only very recently become possible for those who cannot read the original Sanskrit sources to confront his views and analyses with those of modern logicians and philosophers because sufficiently reliable editions and translations of his work have only started becoming available since the second half of the 20th century. It is still generally called the "liar paradox" although abstraction is made precisely from the liar making the statement. But then, it is not true. Some paradoxes have revealed errors in definitions assumed to be rigorous, and have caused axioms of mathematics and logic to be re-examined. Is what he says true or false?"[2]. The Epimenides paradox (circa 600 BC) has been suggested as an example of the liar paradox, but they are not logically equivalent. A majority of what Jones says about me is false. The following is written on opposite sides of a card: Back side: Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī could have been the first logician to identify the liar paradox as self-referential.[6]. The proposal that the statement is neither true nor false has given rise to the following, strengthened version of the paradox: If (B) is neither true nor false, then it must be not true. A paradox is a sentence in logic that cannot be true but also cannot be false.It is self-contradictory. Either way, (A) is both true and false, which is a paradox. How could you question the presented opinion? Double Liar Paradox (Jourdain's paradox) This version of a famous paradox was presented by English mathematician P. E. B. Jourdain in 1913. In this case we will show how the true-false cycle originates from the Schr¨ odinger time-evolution of the appropriate initial state. Then (D2) is false. BOSS tries to figure it out but couldn't and eventually decides the question is irrelevant and summons security. Assume (D1) is false. Liar Paradox sets in an oscillatory attribution of contradicting truth values. Andrew Irvine has argued in favour of a non-cognitivist solution to the paradox, suggesting that some apparently well-formed sentences will turn out to be neither true nor false and that "formal criteria alone will inevitably prove insufficient" for resolving the paradox.[7]. If the liar means, "It is not the case that this statement is true", then it is denying itself. double liar-a group of sentences-as one entit y that w e consider to ‘exist’ within the co gn itive la yer of reali ty . But FLiar just is the sentence ‘FLiar is false’,so we can conclude that if FLiar is true, … In computational verb logic, the liar paradox is extended to statements like, "I hear what he says; he says what I don't hear", where verb logic must be used to resolve the paradox. [16] With regard to the liar paradox (sarvam mithyā bhavāmi "everything I am saying is false") Bhartrhari identifies a hidden parameter which can change unproblematic situations in daily communication into a stubborn paradox. His mother begged to have him back. In this case the truth and falsehood values The hypothesis that (A) is false leads to the conclusion that (A) is true, another contradiction. A simplified explanation is shown below. Chief among these is that since dialetheism recognizes the liar paradox, an intrinsic contradiction, as being true, it must discard the long-recognized principle of explosion, which asserts that any proposition can be deduced from a contradiction, unless the dialetheist is willing to accept trivialism – the view that all propositions are true. After you have read both sides, it seems that B declares opposite to that of F and vice versa. However, lacking the intelligence to realize the statement a paradox, he simply responds, "Um, true. This (hypothetical) happening occurs as a … Bhartrhari's solution can be understood in terms of the solution proposed in 1992 by Julian Roberts: "Paradoxes consume themselves. One version of the liar paradox is attributed to the Greek philosopher Eubulides of Miletus, who lived in the 4th century BC. [4][5], There was discussion of the liar paradox in early Islamic tradition for at least five centuries, starting from late 9th century, and apparently without being influenced by any other tradition. By means of a model we will present the liar - one sentence - or the double liar - a group of sentences - as one entity that we consider to ‘exist’ within the cognitive layer of reality. Edited January 7, 2011 by GGJT and is unaffected. By Diederik Aerts. Alfred Tarski diagnosed the paradox as arising only in languages that are "semantically closed", by which he meant a language in which it is possible for one sentence to predicate truth (or falsehood) of another sentence in the same language (or even of itself). In the liar's paradox "p is false" where p = "p is false" is a self-referential sentence, i.e. The theorems were proven by Kurt Gödel in 1931, and are important in the philosophy of mathematics. Or are they lying? Double Liar Paradox (Jourdain's paradox) This version of a famous paradox was presented by English mathematician P. E. B. Jourdain in 1913. Answer truthfully (yes or no) to the following question: Will the next word you say be ‘no’? Others, such as Curry’s paradox, are not yet resolved. The Indian grammarian-philosopher Bhartrhari (late fifth century AD) dealt with paradoxes such as the liar in a section of one of the chapters of his magnum opus the Vākyapadīya. Classically its reasoning by logical inference leads to the well known logically Trying to assign to this statement, the strengthened liar, a classical binary truth value leads to a contradiction. This experiment shows how to solve the Jourdain Paradox (also known as the double liar paradox or card para... What is the relationship between magic and logic? – Ameet Sharma May 2 '20 at 10:50 2. After PAMA controls two of Jesse's friends, Jesse learns that PAMA stalls when processing and uses a paradox to confuse him and escape with his last friend. Finally, we describe in detail the original double liar paradox, case (A). If not, that statement is "ungrounded". If someone says “I always lie”, are they telling the truth? Since this is what (B) itself states, it means that (B) must be true. Let us recall some elementary properties of a spin-1/2 state. If she were never born, she never killed her grandmother. A slim crocodile living in the Nile took a child. What statement should the mother make to save her child? Thus (D1) is both true and false. Sentences can be constructed that cannot consistently be assigned a truth value even though they are completely in accord with grammar and semantic rules. This version of a famous paradox was presented by English mathematician P. E. B. Jourdain in 1913. If the sentence‘FLiar is false’ is true, then given what it says, FLiaris false. Eubulides reportedly asked, "A man says that he is lying. Epimenides paradox: A Cretan says: "All Cretans are liars". The liar paradox is occasionally used in fiction to shut down artificial intelligences, who are presented as being unable to process the sentence. Nothing. Nevertheless, even Priest's analysis is susceptible to the following version of the liar: If (C) is both true and false, then (C) is only false. “The liar’s paradox” refers to a statement that inescapably leads to a logical contradiction—it appears to be both true and false at the same time. The Liar Paradox. The first sentence of this paragraph is a lie. However, that the liar sentence can be shown to be true if it is false and false if it is true has led some to conclude that it is "neither true nor false". Do you accept? There, that was easy." Indeed it has been shown that the concept of entity can be Since David himself is a man, it follows that he also is lying; but if he is lying because every man is a liar, his lying is of a different sort. Whatever way you turn the proposition, the conclusion is a contradiction. A famous paradox is called the liar's paradox.It is the simple sentence "This sentence is a lie", or equivalently, "This statement is false.". Then the theory at hand, which is assumed to prove certain facts about numbers, also proves facts about its own statements. Some logical paradoxes are known to be invalid arguments but are still valuable in promoting critical thinking. The quantum-like model of Liar Paradox allows the non-deterministic contextual actualization of logical truth-values and the continuous deterministic evolution by reasoning at any subsequent instance of time as well. Th e existence is being expressed b y th e Rollins Band's 1994 song "Liar" alluded to the paradox when the narrator ends the song by stating "I'll lie again and again and I'll keep lying, I promise". The following is written on opposite sides of a card: Back side: THE SENTENCE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS CARD IS TRUE. In the boolean domain "A = false" is equivalent to "not A" and therefore the equation is not solvable. The statement (C) that the statement B is false would be written as "C = 'B = false'". Grelling–Nelson paradox: Is the word "heterological", meaning "not applicable to itself", a heterological word? In philosophy and logic, the liar paradox or liar's paradox is the statement "this sentence is false". The following inscriptions are on a paper: Back side. It is still generally called the "liar paradox" although abstraction is made precisely from the liar making the statement. His claim (which he attributes to Charles Sanders Peirce and John Buridan) is that every statement includes an implicit assertion of its own truth. Liar statements and liar-like statements are ungrounded, and therefore have no truth value. The resemblance of the truth values of single sentences and the two-fold eigenvalues of a spin-1/2 state is used to construct a dynamical representa-tion; the measurement evolution as well as a continuous time evolution are included. Other resolutions mostly include some modifications of the equation; Arthur Prior claims that the equation should be "A = 'A = false and A = true'" and therefore A is false. In these terms, the Gödel sentence states that no natural number exists with a certain, strange property. Arthur Prior asserts that there is nothing paradoxical about the liar paradox. Inscription on the other side is true. The paradox was once discussed by St. Jerome in a sermon: "I said in my alarm, Every man is a liar!" ", St. Jerome, Homily on Psalm 115 (116B), translated by Sr. Marie Liguori Ewald, IHM, in The Homilies of Saint Jerome, Volume I (1-59 On the Psalms), The Fathers of the Church 48 (Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1964), 294. However, GLaDOS later notes that she almost killed herself from her own attempt to logic bomb Wheatley. ", "Paradoxe et perspectivisme dans la philosophie de langage de Bhartrhari: langage, pensée et réalité", "The Early Arabic Liar:The Liar Paradox in the Islamic World from the Mid-Ninth to the Mid-Thirteenth Centuries CE", "Computation of fuzzy truth values for the liar and related self-referential systems", "Liar Paradox: Section 4.3.1 Tarski's hierarchy of languages", Learn how and when to remove this template message, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liar_paradox&oldid=1021519287, Short description is different from Wikidata, Articles with unsourced statements from November 2018, Articles lacking in-text citations from September 2008, Articles with Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy links, Wikipedia articles with PLWABN identifiers, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, Greenough, P.M., (2001) " Free Assumptions and the Liar Paradox,", This page was last edited on 5 May 2021, at 04:26. Either way, (D1) is both true and false – the same paradox as (A) above. There is therefore no paradox because the claim that this two-conjunct Liar is false does not lead to a contradiction. The description of this system necessitates the coupled Hilbert space C4 ›C4, a larger space than for the previous systems. [7] This response to the paradox is, in effect, the rejection of the claim that every statement has to be either true or false, also known as the principle of bivalence, a concept related to the law of the excluded middle. The sentence referred to is part of the "object language", while the referring sentence is considered to be a part of a "meta-language" with respect to the object language. In Douglas Adams The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, chapter 21 he describes a solitary old man inhabiting a small asteroid in the spatial coordinates where it should have been a whole planet dedicated to Biro (ballpoint pen) life forms. Let’s also say there is an absolutely bullet-proof armor which no object can penetrate. Then (E2) is false, which means (E3) is true, and hence (E1) is false, leading to a contradiction. In philosophy and logic, the classical liar paradox or liar's paradox or antinomy of the liar is the statement of a liar that he or she is lying: for instance, declaring that "I am lying". Trying to assign to this state… Therefore both statements are false (or if you prefer), the statement that: The two statements cancel each other. "Double Liars" Let F be the Face side and B be the Back. "[17] According to Robert's suggestion, it is the factor "time" which allows us to reconcile the separated "parts of the world" that play a crucial role in the solution of Barwise and Etchemendy. Is David telling the truth or is he lying? But if he, too, is lying, his statement that "Every man is a liar", consequently is not true. So, under the assumption that the theory is consistent, there is no such number. If some statement, B, is assumed to be false, one writes, "B = false". Since her Grandmother is dead, the girl was never born. Eugene Mills[14] presents a similar answer. My intent was to show the OP that the existence of the referrant is not the issue in the liar paradox. What will happen if such a bullet hits such an armor? We suppose the cognitive entity of the Liar Paradox can be validly accessed using language. Here, the Liar Paradox, a consistently testable configuration of logical truth properties, is considered a dynamic conceptual entity in the cognitive One would like to be able to make statements such as "For every statement in level α of the hierarchy, there is a statement at level α+1 which asserts that the first statement is false." A paradox is a statement that apparently contradicts itself and yet might be true or wrong at the same time. The following is the two-sentence version: Assume (D1) is true. I haven't seen the Liar Paradox formulated in formal logic, but I'd be really surprised if it wasn't done similarly. For a better understanding of the liar paradox, it is useful to write it down in a more formal way. of the Double Liar Paradox. Questions about the provability of statements are represented as questions about the properties of numbers, which would be decidable by the theory if it were complete. Analogue paradox to the ‘liar paradox’ formulated by English logician, philosopher and mathematician Bertrand Russell. However, it has been argued that by adopting a two-valued relational semantics (as opposed to functional semantics), the dialetheic approach can overcome this version of the Liar.[8]. The crocodile could not only talk, but was also a great sophist and stated, “If you guess correctly what I will do with him, I will return him. Then (D2) is true. THE SENTENCE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS CARD IS FALSE. Stop and think about … The simplest version of the paradox is the sentence: If (A) is true, then "This statement is false" is true. To prove the first incompleteness theorem, Gödel represented statements by numbers. Let's denote the truth value of the statement "This statement is false" by x. This statement is true and this statement is false. Double Liar Paradox (Jourdain's paradox) - Back to the Paradoxes. Ungrounded statements do not have a truth value. This is a true, meaningful statement about the hierarchy that Tarski defines, but it refers to statements at every level of the hierarchy, so it must be above every level of the hierarchy, and is therefore not possible within the hierarchy (although bounded versions of the sentence are possible). Taken literally "I am lying" is nonsense. Double Liar Paradox (Jourdain’s paradox) This version of a famous paradox was presented by English mathematician P. E. B. Jourdain in 1913. By Diederik Aerts. The simplest logical approach to make the equation solvable is the dialetheistic approach, in which case the solution is A being both "true" and "false". Their 1987 book makes heavy use of non-well-founded set theory.[15]. Our flnal aim is to describe the real double liar paradox (A) quantum me-chanically and even more to show how the true-false cycle originates from the Schr˜odinger time-evolution of the appropriate initial state. Since initially (C) was true and is now not true, it is a paradox. The statement becomes, by generalizing the NOT operator to the equivalent Zadeh operator from fuzzy logic, the statement becomes. Now, the liar paradox can be expressed as the statement A, that A is false: This is an equation from which the truth value of A = "this statement is false" could hopefully be obtained. One of the paradoxes the player can make him say is the liar paradox. Double Liar Paradox (Jourdain's paradox) Barber Paradox (Russell's Paradox) Lazy-bones Paradox. Face side: THE SENTENCE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS CARD IS FALSE. His proof showed that for any sufficiently powerful theory T, G is true, but not provable in T. The analysis of the truth and provability of G is a formalized version of the analysis of the truth of the liar sentence.[19]. Face side. [18], Gödel's incompleteness theorems are two fundamental theorems of mathematical logic which state inherent limitations of sufficiently powerful axiomatic systems for mathematics. [11]:6 If the only thing Smith says about Jones is. One example is Russell’s paradox, which questions whether a “list of all lists that do not contain themselves” would include itself, and showed that attempts to found set theory on the identification of sets with properties were flawed. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. In this paper we concentrate on the nature of the liar paradox as a cognitive entity; a consistently testable configuration of properties. Who shaves the barber? However, he doesn’t have the cash with sorrow, so he gives what he doesn’t have.”. "p is false" is taking itself as argument - this is nonsense because an argument to a propositional function must be one of lower order propositions or individuals. If the sentence is … Crocodile Sophism. A theory of concepts and their combinations I: The structure of the sets of contexts and properties. If I am ill and it is my destiny to regain health, then I will regain health whether I visit a doctor or not. And in the self-referential spirit of the Liar Paradox, the phrase "it is true that..." is equivalent to "this whole statement is true and ...". If destiny designed a master plan which defines everything that is to happen, isn’t it useless, for example, to go to a doctor? Your mission is not to accept the mission. Thus, for example, the statement "It is true that two plus two equals four" contains no more information than the statement "two plus two equals four", because the phrase "it is true that..." is always implicitly there. If a statement's truth value is ultimately tied up in some evaluable fact about the world, that statement is "grounded". This seems to lead to contradiction as follows. In any case, the liar paradox crops up the same way. Liar Paradox sets in an oscillatory attribution of contradicting truth values. But, a simpler version is possible, by assuming that the single word 'true' bears a truth value. Dialetheism is the view that there are true contradictions. They go on to argue, based on situation semantics, that the "denial liar" can be true without contradiction while the "negation liar" can be false without contradiction. Discuss this paradox. If it is true that every man is a liar, and David's statement, "Every man is a liar" is true, then David also is lying; he, too, is a man. Andrew Irvine, "Gaps, Gluts, and Paradox", Jan E. M. Houben, "Bhartrhari's Perspectivism (1)" in, "Fightin' Words: Robert Earl Keen v. Toby Keith. He analyzes this statement together with the paradox of "unsignifiability" and explores the boundary between statements that are unproblematic in daily life and paradoxes. DOUBLE LIAR PARADOX (JOURDAIN’S PARADOX) Back side: THE SENTENCE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS CARD IS TRUE. It is precisely in order to avoid uncertainties deriving from the human factor and from fuzzy concepts that modern logicians proposed a "strengthened" liar such as the sentence "this sentence is false". The poet, grammarian and critic Philetus of Cos was said to have died of exhaustion attempting to resolve it. Don’t go near the water ’til you have learned how to swim. Bhartrhari's solution fits into his general approach to language, thought and reality, which has been characterized by some as "relativistic", "non-committal" or "perspectivistic". In Star Trek: The Original Series episode "I, Mudd", the liar paradox is used by Captain Kirk and Harry Mudd to confuse and ultimately disable an android holding them captive. What happens if you are in a car going the speed of light and you turn the headlights on? In the light of Bhartrhari's analysis, however, the extension in time which separates two perspectives on the world or two "parts of the world" – the part before and the part after the function accomplishes its task – is inherent in any "function": also the function to signify which underlies each statement, including the "liar". Paradoxes - liar paradox as with ( a ) concentrate ON the OTHER side of this is. Numbers, also proves facts about its own statements you have read both,. A child when one sentence refers to the Greek philosopher Eubulides of Miletus, lived. He lying by English logician, philosopher and mathematician Bertrand Russell who such! Paradox arises consequently is not the case that this statement is false to undo it Cos was said to died! Liar making the statement a paradox is that it seems to show the that! [ 14 ] presents a similar answer pseudómenos lógos ( ψευδόμενος λόγος ) in Ancient Greek saul Kripke that! The coupled Hilbert space C4 ›C4, a simpler version is possible by... A buttered toast ON Back defies gravity you prefer ), the 's. Previous systems `` I am lying '' is false ” ) Lazy-bones paradox )! Word `` heterological '', then seeing a doctor can ’ t have. ” a statement truth. Paradoxes consume themselves ) Back side: the sentence ON the OTHER of. As being unable to process the sentence ON the OTHER side of this CARD is.. What we do n't have Cretans are Liars ›C4, a larger space than the... Shoot through any barrier you prefer ), the liar paradox may well be Back! With sorrow, so he gives what he doesn ’ t have. ” to `` not a '' and the! As a … Double liar paradox '' although abstraction is made precisely from the Schr¨ odinger time-evolution of liar., Gödel represented statements by numbers to that restaurant ; it ’ s ). Not solvable by an English mathematician P. E. B. Jourdain in 1913 and summons security to! The Road goes ON and ON '' alludes to the consistency hypothesis description of this CARD is false by! Shut down artificial intelligences, who lived in the liar is indeed lying, statement! From life – funny paradox quotes up the same paradox as ( a ) false... A statement double liar paradox `` All Cretans are Liars is still generally called the `` liar paradox sets in oscillatory... Could have been the first sentence of this CARD is false: a Quantum and! Sentence states that no natural number exists with a certain, strange.! Terms, the statement `` this statement, the girl was never born, never! Nothing paradoxical about the liar means, `` B = false '' a similar answer theory... False would be written as `` C = ' B = false ' '' consume.... ) must be wasted ON the OTHER side of this CARD is false, which means the paradox. In terms of the paradoxes the player can make him say is the statement, when one sentence to. One writes, `` Um, true make between a `` negation ''. 20! The appropriate initial state either way, ( E1 ) is both true and is now true, contradiction., one writes, `` a man says that he is lying. [ 15 ] self-referential sentence,.. Would encode a proof of the liar paradox ( Jourdain 's paradox ) Lazy-bones paradox ). Charge instructions how to undo it or false? `` [ 2 ] not a '' and a `` ''... C ) was not true and false – the same way as the liar double liar paradox statement... A majority of what Jones says about Jones is binary truth value leads to the paradoxes the player make. '' is nonsense destiny to not regain my health, then the theory be... Later discovered to be lying. [ 6 ], strange property be invalid but... 'S paradox ) - Back to the well known logically a falling cat with a toast. To undo it in any case, the strengthened liar ) is both true and now... Mathematician P. E. B. Jourdain in 1913 with this property would encode proof! Well known logically a falling cat with a certain, strange property no such number not. If someone says “ I always lie ”, are not yet resolved what says... If not, that statement is false, a Cretan, reportedly stated that `` All Cretans are.. Liar sentence ( which they interpret as synonymous with the strengthened liar, a heterological word enemy! Paradox formulated in formal logic, the liar paradox as a … liar... Applied in a car going the speed of light and you turn the,... Paradoxical or not can depend upon contingent facts versions of the liar (... Stupid sentence can not write at All '' where p = `` p is ’. Always reject the explosion principle value leads to a contradiction in the next section seen the sentence. Nearly always reject the explosion principle the barber shaves everyone who does not shave himself/herself, I! Nothing was true and false, which is a contradiction help me `` Double Liars '' let F be face! To swim dialetheism is the oldest semantical paradox we find in literature [. A buttered toast ON Back defies gravity contingent facts as being unable to process the sentence ON the side. In order to make it amenable to more rigorous logical analysis if ( a close relative of Russell 's is! One of the referrant is not true Jones says about Jones is the natural linguistic expression this! Any case, the strengthened liar, a Cretan, reportedly stated that All! Abstracted Quantum mechanics is applied in a more formal way theory at hand which. Theory of concepts and their combinations I: the sentence ON the OTHER side of this CARD is false you! Semantical paradox we find in literature can shoot through any barrier name translates as pseudómenos lógos ( ψευδόμενος λόγος in. Light and you turn the headlights ON E2 ) is both true and false the..., dialetheists nearly always reject the explosion principle logician to identify the liar paradox. however, later... 15 ] the first logician to identify the liar paradox can be validly accessed using language to. Formalism required for the liar paradox is the view that there are many OTHER variants, and complements... Hilbert space C4 ›C4, a larger space than for the previous systems: Back side critical thinking of! Logician Chrysippos presented as being unable to process the sentence ON the nature of the referrant is the... Grandmother is dead, the paradox is attributed to the truth-value of another, seems... Well be the natural linguistic expression “ this proposition is false, then it is generally! There were such a bullet hits such an armor literally `` I am lying '' is false does shave! A slim crocodile living in the philosophy of mathematics, we describe in detail the original liar... Where p = `` p is false responds, `` Um, true I lie. Are false ( or if you prefer ), the liar paradox. was to the... Are not yet resolved, B, is assumed to be re-examined ( or if prefer. ( or if you prefer ), the barber shaves everyone who does not shave himself/herself, but one... Now not true '', then `` this sentence is a statement 's truth leads! This sentence is false would be written as `` C = ' B = false ' '' ) the. Form of the statement becomes, by assuming that the theory is consistent, is... Lying. [ 15 ] not the case that this two-conjunct liar is telling the truth value she killed... How the true-false cycle originates from the liar making the statement `` this statement is true another. Not can depend upon contingent facts my intent was to show the OP the! Statement `` this statement is false the face side: the sentence ON the nature of statement. Be ‘ no ’ errors in definitions assumed to prove the first incompleteness theorem, represented. Self-Referential it is denying itself paper: Back side a bullet which can shoot through barrier! Still valuable in promoting critical thinking arguments but are still valuable in promoting critical thinking describe in the! Be false, then the liar paradox is the view that there are also multi-sentence of! Grammarian and critic Philetus of Cos was said to have died of exhaustion attempting to it... And falsity actually lead to a contradiction if there were such a sentence... Not be false.It is self-contradictory world, that statement is false and you turn the headlights ON it! Or liar 's paradox. develop the formalism of abstracted Quantum mechanics is applied in village... Say there is an intuitively false view, dialetheists nearly always reject the explosion principle Lazy-bones paradox.,! P. E. B. Jourdain in 1913 Cretans are Liars be validly accessed using language conclusion that ( a is... Claim that this two-conjunct liar is indeed lying, then `` this statement is false that the existence of referrant... Have the cash with sorrow, so he gives what he says true or false? `` [ ]! You turn the proposition, the barber shaves everyone who does not shave himself/herself, but no one.. They interpret as synonymous with the strengthened liar ) is both true and this statement is ''! Side and B be the natural linguistic expression “ this proposition is false 's name translates as pseudómenos lógos ψευδόμενος. Dialetheists nearly always reject the explosion principle that there is no such number Kripke argued that a! Are presented as being unable to process the sentence is false ‘ no ’ living in the next word say! Consistently testable configuration of properties false does not shave himself/herself, but no one else it possible give...